A former contractor for several secret federal agencies and his attorney, who both sued former FBI Director James Comey claiming he obstructed justice by burying an investigation into the mass surveillance of Americans, are asking a federal court for a protection order preventing the destruction of evidence in the case.
The plaintiffs in the case are Dennis Montgomery, a whistleblower who worked as a contractor for the National Security Agency, Central Intelligence Agency and Director of National Intelligence, and his lawyer, Larry Klayman, of FreedomWatch.org.
They have filed in U.S. District Court in Washington a motion for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction.
They are asking the court to prevent the defendants, including Comey, the FBI and a long list of other federal officials mostly under the administration of Barack Obama, from continuing “illegally and unconstitutionally spying on and surveilling millions of Americans, including plaintiffs, without probable cause or a warrant.”
Secondly, they are asking the court to prevent the defendants from “destroying evidence of illegal and unconstitutional spying” that Montgomery turned over the Comey – on the promise that it was going to be investigated.
These goals can be reached with a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction, they explain.
Instead, the “investigation” that was promised was buried by Comey, and the evidence now is endangered, they allege.
Defendants in the case include Comey, who famously took with him government records when he was fired recently by President Trump, then turned them over to a friend with instructions to leak them to the media to instigate interest in a special prosecutor over claims of links between the Trump campaign and Russia – an investigation that to date has yielded no evidence.
Others are the FBI, Michael Rogers, the NSA, John Brennan, Mike Pompeo, the CIA, James Clapper, Dan Coats, and Obama.
They were accused in the original lawsuit, filed only a few weeks ago, of “illegally and unconstitutionally spying on and surveilling millions of Americans, including plaintiffs, without probable cause or a warrant, and … destroying evidence of illegal and unconstitutional spying turned over to defendant Comey and the FBI by plaintiff Montgomery.”
The defendants, the motion explains, “have engaged in an ongoing conspiracy to illegally and unconstitutionally spying on millions of Americans, including plaintiffs, without probable cause or a warrant.”
And the motion alleges the illegal spying continues.
Klayman, in the motion, points out that the same Washington court, in an earlier case, “issued two preliminary injunctions, including one that ‘bars the government from collecting … any telephone metadata associated with these plaintiffs’ Verizon Business Network Services accounts…”
That involved the government’s efforts to spy on Americans by monitoring cell phone communications.
This new lawsuit alleges misbehavior on the part of Comey and others when Montgomery “was induced by Defendants Comey and the FBI and made to turn over 47 hard drives of evidence of the aforementioned illegal, unconstitutional activity, which hard drives alone are valued in excess of $50,000… Indeed, counsel for Montgomery, plaintiff Klayman, was told and assured by the former general counsel of the FBI, James Baker, that defendant Comey was taking ‘hands on’ supervision and conducting the FBI’s Montgomery investigation, given its importance.”
Much of the information was classified and Klayman never saw it, “which is why the information was given to defendant Comey and the FBI to begin with,” he explained.
“As a result, on or about December 21, 2015, plaintiff Montgomery interviewed under oath at the FBI field office in the District of Columbia.
There, over the course of an over three-hour interview, recorded on video, with special agents Walter Giardina and William Barnett, plaintiff Montgomery meticulously laid out the NSA, CIA, DNI’s, and the other defendants’ – particularly defendants Clapper and Brennan’s – pattern and practice – of conducting illegal, unconstitutional surveillance against millions of Americans, including prominent Americans such as the chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, other justices, 156 judges, prominent businessmen, and others such as Donald J. Trump…”
Klayman explained it is alleged that Comey, “in concert with the other defendants,” buried an FBI investigation into Montgomery’s whistleblower claims, essentially obstructing justice.
“Having asked the intelligence and judiciary committees in Congress to investigate the alleged obstruction of justice, and their having not taken action to date, Mr. Montgomery and I, on behalf of ourselves, had to take matters into our own legal hands.
This mass surveillance, which threatens the privacy of all innocent Americans, must be ordered to cease forthwith, as it endangers our democracy and our republic,” Klayman said.
The latest move comes after Circa News reported, according to Klayman,
“The FBI has illegally shared raw intelligence about Americans with unauthorized third parties and violated other constitutional privacy protections, according to newly declassified government documents that undercut the bureau’s public assurances about how carefully it handles warrantless spy data to avoid abuses or leaks …
Once-top secret U.S. intelligence memos reviewed by Circa tell a different story, citing instances of ‘disregard’ for rules, inadequate training and ‘deficient’ oversight and even one case of deliberately sharing spy data with a forbidden part.”
The new motion explains that Montgomery’s testimony and evidence documented how the rogue federal officials conducted surveillance, and then covered it up.
The filing argues the plaintiffs are entitled to the court’s protection, since courts previously have found that even a minimal deprivation of constitutional rights is a major injury.