Kind of hilarious when you consider Carnegie’s own climate scientist, rabid geoengineering supporter Ken Caldeira, claims chemtrails aren’t real…
Since we’ve been sprayed in this decade, and since we’ve been unwilling subjects of other chemical and biological warfare experiments as Americans and other people from the 1950’s until now, it has become relevant to understand the exact individuals and entities responsible for geoengineering.
Recently, the US government, Carnegie Institutions, Harvard scientists and other prestigious groups and figures have been voraciously calling for the skies to be sprayed to block out the sun and combat an overly hyped climate change.
If we allowed them to spray in the open, imagine how much worse it will be than now. They claim “chemtrails” are a lewd conspiracy theory while openly proposing the skies be sprayed in the exact same manner.
If we don’t protest their proposal to spray the skies now, in 20 years we’ll be living in an aluminum poisoned nightmare where questioning the health of geoengineering the weather, hazing out the sun to combat climate change, will be as taboo as being critical of vaccines.
We cannot allow geoengineering to become normalized in the public consciousness: and the only thing necessary to prevent that is the simple truth. It’s not a good idea to spray the skies, to poison our environment with aluminum and other material. It turns us into subjects and grants even more control to a power structure over our lives.
It will also make any other chemical or biological material sprayed on us indistinguishable from the geoengineering spray if we allow this precedent to be set.
We must fight geoengineering, and target the exact players involved: such as the Carnegie Council. Ken Caldeira, the king of climate science bullsh*ttery, is out with a new claim that his latest study proves chemtrails aren’t real:
Well-understood physical and chemical processes can easily explain the alleged evidence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program, commonly referred to as “chemtrails” or “covert geoengineering,” concludes a new study from Carnegie Science, University of California Irvine, and the nonprofit organization Near Zero.
Some groups and individuals erroneously believe that the long-lasting condensation trails, or contrails, left behind aircraft are evidence of a secret large-scale spraying program. They call these imagined features “chemtrails.” Adherents of this conspiracy theory sometimes attribute this alleged spraying to the government and sometimes to industry.
The authors of this study, including Carnegie’s Ken Caldeira, conducted a survey of the world’s leading atmospheric scientists, who categorically rejected the existence of a secret spraying program. The team’s findings, published by Environmental Research Letters, are based on a survey of two groups of experts: atmospheric chemists who specialize in condensation trails and geochemists working on atmospheric deposition of dust and pollution.
Take a big fat guess who made man-made global warming peddler Caldeira’s magical list of “the world’s leading atmospheric scientists”…
Here comes the shocker:
The survey results show that 76 of the 77 participating scientists said they had not encountered evidence of a secret spraying program, and agree that the alleged evidence cited by the individuals who believe that atmospheric spraying is occurring could be explained through other factors, such as typical airplane contrail formation and poor data sampling.
So, let’s get this straight. Caldeira surveyed 77 of his buddies, and 76 of them agreed with him?
Wow. Simply mind blowing.
Gee. That’s really not much of a “scientific study,” now is it?
But it doesn’t matter. The headline is all most people will see, as with most stories like this.
Caldeira finished his press release up with:
“I felt it was important to definitively show what real experts in contrails and aerosols think. We might not convince die-hard believers that their beloved secret spraying program is just a paranoid fantasy, but hopefully their friends will accept the facts.”
You see, this, right here, is the kind of “research” that man-made climate change scientists love to use to back up their phony narrative that “the science is settled” and to push Agenda 21 — even though it really isn’t settled. At all.